Clinton "pimping out" her Own Daughter

When does a reporter cross the line between informing the public of news and important events and becomes a biased ill tempered player in the dirty politics? MSNBC’s reported David Shuster certainly crossed that line making his “famous” comment about Chelsea Clinton being “pimped out” by Clinton’s campaign to make calls to the celebrities and Superdelegates. In my mind, the reporters always have been the essential part of the campaign in the sense that they served the public by investigating candidates positions, pointing out facts and discrepancies, and pushing candidates to move away of their scripts and reveal their character. Ability and opportunity to do it puts in the hands of reporters not only tremendous power but also responsibility before public. Therefore, comments such as this can not be regarded just as a simple mistake, but rather should be looked at as the professional misconduct. Thus, MSNBC took the right actions by suspending David Shuster from broadcasting. Moreover, it wasn’t the only personal attack to Hillary Clinton’s campaign. Earlier, Chris Matthews said that Hillary’s “political career had been made possible by her husband's philandering”. Do you think such remarks are appropriate and how do they affect the campaign?